This is What’s Trending Today.
Arne Murke is crediting his blue jeans with saving his life.
The 30-year-old German man was thrown off a sailboat in rough seas near New Zealand.
Murke says he turned his jeans into a life jacket that kept him afloat for over three hours. He was later rescued by a coast guard crew.
The German was sailing with his brother in Tolaga Bay, on the east coast of New Zealand's north island. They reportedly had agreed to take the boat, the yacht Wahoo, to Brazil.
The trip was uneventful until the yacht’s boom turned suddenly, hitting Arne Murke and knocking him in the water.
"Luckily, I knew the trick with the jeans," he told The New Zealand Herald newspaper. "Without the jeans I wouldn't be here today. They were really the thing that saved me."
Murke added that he took the yacht delivery job in order to raise money for his 10-month old daughter. She lives with his girlfriend in the Philippines.
"While I was in the water I was just thinking, I can't leave my daughter behind without a father. That was the biggest motivation," he said.
Murke said he tied knots at the end of the legs and pulled them over water to get air inside. He then forced his jeans under water to trap air and create a life jacket.
A rescue helicopter found the German about 3 and a half hours after he fell from the boat. Images of Murke floating in the water while being rescued have been appearing on the internet.
Chris Henshaw is the Senior Search and Rescue Coordinator for Rescue Coordination Center New Zealand. He said in a statement that the yacht had communications devices, including radio and emergency beacons, which helped alert rescuers. Without these devices, Henshaw noted, "it may have turned out differently."
And that’s What’s Trending Today. I'm John Russell.
Praveen Menon reported on this story for Reuters. John Russell adapted it for Learning English. George Grow was the editor.
Words in This Story
yachtsman – n. a man who owns or sails a yacht
jeans – n. pants made of a strong cloth (called denim)
yacht – n. a large boat that is used for racing or pleasure
knot – n. a part that forms when you tie a piece of rope, string, fabric, etc., to itself or to something else
boom – n. a long pole connected to the bottom of a sailboat’s sail
life jacket – n. an inflatable device for keeping a person afloat in water
We want to hear from you. Write to us in the Comments Section.
At CafeX, a robot makes many cups of coffee, knows when supplies are needed and even dances. There is always a human nearby to help and talk with customers. The café is a modern vision of collaboration.
British man is 'cured' of HIV
Doctors say a man in Britain is now clear of HIV after stem cell treatment.
What do we call someone who gives blood to help the sick and injured?
Watch the video and complete the activity
NEWS REVIEW PODCAST NOW AVAILABLE - SUBSCRIBE HERE
Did you like that? Why not try these?
A man in Britain has become the second person to be cleared of HIV after receiving a stem cell transplant. Doctors said he received bone marrow stem cells almost three years ago from a donor with a rare genetic mutation that resists HIV infection.
Key words and phrases
situation of widespread disease
• The ease and frequency of air travel can quickly turn a local disease into an epidemic.
• The head of police has reported that the city is suffering from a crime epidemic.
permanent genetic change
• The majority of cancers result from a mutation of the body's cells.
• The book went through three mutations after I received feedback from my editor.
encourages or causes
• The large drop in the company's share price was spurred by a profit warning.
• The fear of failing his exams spurred Dan into action and he started studying harder!
Try our quiz to see how well you've learned today's language.
News Review quiz
Now you've watched the video, try to answer these questions about the language in the news.
Battle for democracy
Breaking News March 13, 2019 01:00
By KAS CHANWANPEN
Junta's ambition to stay on in power has given rise to a unique scenario marked by a distinct ideological divide Experts believe Prayut can be defeated in the election but consensus will be needed to end a culture of coups
WILL THE junta stay or go? This question seems to be uppermost in voters’ minds, pushing to the rear bread-and-butter issues popular in previous election campaigns like price guarantees for agricultural products, free schooling, healthcare etc.
In less than two weeks, Thailand will be voting for the first time since the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) seized power in 2014, in an election many see as an ideological battle between the democratic and authoritarian camps.
Hence, as politicians campaign for votes, make speeches and participate in debates, their stance on the junta has become important. The two camps began taking shape after the 2006 coup, but this phenomenon was not seen in the post-coup election in 2007. So, why now?
The power of democracy is the answer, political scientist Suraphot Thaweesak said. Though the red-shirt movement was huge 12 years ago, he explained its pro-democracy position was nothing like it is today.
“Most of the time, they were called ‘champions of [former PM Thaksin] Shinawatra’s interests’ – wanting an election as a means to support Thaksin. Nothing about them was seen as contributing to democracy,” he said. “Also, the Shinawatra camp was cautious when it came to democracy. They didn’t want to take risks, so they made compromises with the right wing.”
However, through political turbulence and debates, the pro-democracy camp has grown and developed, he explained. The pro-democracy camp, which had been tied to the Shinawatra bloc, appears to have found its independence, he said.
In this election though, the war between the liberals and conservatives has been accentuated, mainly thanks to the emergence of Future Forward Party (FWP), he said.
“I give FWP credit for giving momentum and emphasising the ideology of democracy beyond just paying it lip service,” he said. “This has given birth to a so-called pro-democracy bloc, which has given rise to a battle between democracy and authoritarianism.”
As for the Thaksin-linked Pheu Thai Party, Suraphot said he has also seen a change in them that backs his idea of this ballot being a battle between the two ideologies. He said that after all these years, Pheu Thai has finally realised that it cannot make compromises with the right wing, and hence has decided to focus more on its beliefs and economic policies.
Apart from the deep-rooted conflicts plaguing the Kingdom for over a decade, other political observers are seeing other angles that make this election unique.
Pro-democracy activist Nuttaa Mahuttana’s said the NCPO regime and its political ambitions make this election very different.
“Previous coupmakers did not show any signs of wanting to cling to power, unlike this junta,” the activist said. “This time, the pro-junta Phalang Pracharat Party – which shares the same name as the government’s cash-handout programme – is so obviously working for the junta. In fact, it was founded by the junta’s Cabinet members.”
Nuttaa said she believes the party’s every move is planned for General Prayut Chan-o-cha to retake power. For instance, she said, the party has headhunted an unprecedented number of former MPs.
“And now Prayut is their PM candidate,” she said. “It will become even easier for him to take over thanks to the 250 senators he has appointed. So, this plan to have Prayut stay on has given rise to this ideological battle.”
The battle can also be blamed on the NCPO’s legacy, such as the 2017 Constitution and its 20-year national strategy, Nuttaa added.
These strategies will dictate the direction of the country for the next two decades, yet there has been very little public participation in their creation.
“So, this election is significant. If Prayut does return, he will have all this apparatus,” the activist said, implying the junta chief may be unstoppable if he does win the election. “It is important that we support the pro-democracy camp, so that after the election all these NCPO-created strategies can be removed.”
FWP deputy leader Chamnan Chanruang, however, believes politicians are still focusing on bread and butter issues.
In fact, he said, the anti-junta sentiment largely stemmed from the NCPO’s poor performance. So, when people vote against Prayut, it will only show that they want the military to be out of politics and want professional politicians to do the job and put money in their pockets, he said.
But where will this battle take the country?
All three observers responded differently.
Chamnan believes the junta will be easily defeated, as it will not win any support from the House of Representatives.
“Prayut will never survive the censure motions,” he said. “The 250 senators won’t be able to carry him, and he will just have to give in when the sentiment against him is strong enough.”
However, he admitted this triumph will not necessarily guarantee an end to coups. The only way coups can be stopped is if there is a common consensus, he added.
The two other observers, however, see only a dim hope for democracy.
Nuttaa said that with the dissolution of the Thai Raksa Chart Party, the anti-junta bloc has only a slim chance of winning.
Similarly, Suphot said new regulations have put the pro-democracy camps at a disadvantage, but maybe defeat is a necessary process for the development of democracy.
“Each time they are defeated, injustice is exposed,” Suphot said. “In the process, the conservative camp is destroying its credibility and legitimacy. So, though it will be a long, tough fight, it will have to continue until democracy triumphs or until the elite yield to liberal democracy.”